Two words get thrown around interchangeably by founders and mean very different things to reporters. Getting them wrong is one of the tells that separates someone who has done this before from someone who hasn't. Worse, it's one of the few PR mistakes that can genuinely cost you a relationship rather than just an email.
The definitions, precisely
An exclusive means one outlet gets the story and nobody else has it. You are giving a single reporter something no competitor can publish. In practice there are two flavors: a true exclusive, where only they ever get the material, and a first-look or exclusive-window exclusive, where they publish first and everyone else gets it afterward. Say which one you mean, because the reporter will assume the stricter version.
An embargo means many outlets get the information in advance on the agreed condition that nobody publishes before a specific time. Everyone gets the same material, and everyone goes at once. The value to the journalist is preparation time: a chance to interview, verify, and write something better than a rushed reaction. The value to you is a cluster of coverage landing simultaneously instead of trickling out over a week.
Two things founders routinely get wrong about embargoes:
- An embargo is an agreement, not a declaration. Writing "EMBARGOED UNTIL TUESDAY 9AM ET" at the top of an unsolicited email to a reporter who never agreed to anything does not bind them. The convention is to ask first ("can I send you something under embargo until Tuesday 9am ET?") and to send the material only after they accept. Some outlets have blanket policies against accepting embargoes at all, and they are entitled to publish what lands in their inbox unconditionally.
- You cannot apply one retroactively. Telling a reporter something and then saying "that's embargoed" afterward is not a thing. Same principle as off the record: the condition has to be agreed before the information moves. If that distinction is new to you, the mechanics of embargoes are worth reading properly.
The trade you're making
Both tools cost you something real. Be clear-eyed about what.
With an exclusive, you trade reach for depth and commitment. One outlet means one story, but it is usually a much better story: the reporter has a reason to invest, to interview your customers, to get the framing right, because they own it. You also get a near-commitment where a cold pitch gets you a maybe. What you give up is every other outlet's coverage of the announcement moment, and you give it up on a bet. If the piece gets killed or buried, your news window closes with nothing to show.
With an embargo, you trade control for simultaneity. You get multiple outlets publishing at the same hour, which looks and feels like momentum and is genuinely useful for anything that benefits from a concentrated moment, whether that's a funding round, a major launch, or a research report. What you give up is control: more people holding your information means more chances it leaks, and you've now got to coordinate a timed sequence instead of one email.
The honest rule of thumb: an exclusive is for news that is interesting but not inevitable. If the announcement wouldn't automatically get written up on its merits, giving one reporter a reason to care is how it gets covered at all. An embargo is for news that will get covered anyway, where your job is to shape the timing and give reporters enough runway to write something good instead of a rewritten press release.
If your news genuinely isn't strong enough for either, neither tool fixes that, so check that first.
How to offer an exclusive
Offer it to one reporter at a time, name the deadline, and mean it.
I can give you this exclusively if you want it. Nobody else has it. I'd need to know by Thursday, and the wire goes out the following Tuesday morning regardless.
Three rules that keep this clean:
- One at a time, in sequence. Pick the outlet you most want, give them a real window to decide, and only move to the next one after they pass. Simultaneous "exclusive" offers to four outlets is the cardinal sin of this whole category.
- Give a deadline, and give them time. Two to four business days. A same-day ultimatum tells them you've been shopping it.
- Say what happens after. Reporters want to know whether they're getting a permanent exclusive or a head start. Name the window: "you'd have it 24 hours before the wire goes out."
Decide in advance what you'll do if they pass. Most founders haven't thought that far and end up scrambling with a launch date three days out.
How to offer an embargo
- Ask before you send. One short email: here's the shape of the news, here's the lift time, can I send you the details under embargo? Include the timezone. Always include the timezone.
- Give enough lead time to be worth taking. Twenty-four to seventy-two hours before the lift is standard. Two hours is not an embargo, it's a countdown, and it insults the reporter's time.
- Send the same material to everyone who accepts. Unequal embargo packages are how you make enemies of the people who got the thin version.
- Be reachable during the window. The whole point of the lead time is that they can ask you things. If you disappear until launch morning, you've given them prep time they can't use.
- Confirm the lift time once, the day before. One line, no drama.
What breaks trust
A short list, each item of which has ended real relationships:
- Offering the same "exclusive" to multiple outlets. They talk to each other. This gets discovered roughly every time, and it is remembered permanently.
- Breaking your own embargo. Tweeting the news, updating the website, or letting an investor post about it before the lift time makes every reporter who honored the agreement look foolish. They will not accept another one from you.
- Quietly giving one embargoed outlet extra material so their version is better. The others notice.
- Pulling an exclusive after someone committed time to it. If you've changed your mind, you've still cost them hours they can't bill.
- Treating a leak as license. If your embargo breaks early somewhere, tell everyone immediately and lift it for all of them at once. Handling it silently is worse than the leak.
Note that the risk is asymmetric. A reporter breaking your embargo costs you one news cycle. You breaking it costs you the outlet.
Sequencing with wire distribution
This is where most plans fall apart, because the wire is a scheduled machine and the exclusive is a human negotiation.
For an exclusive, the order is: reporter publishes first, then your wire release goes out, usually a few hours later, either the same day or the next morning. The release should not contradict or scoop the piece, and it should not go out before it. Schedule the wire after you have a confirmed publication time, not before.
For an embargo, the wire release is scheduled to cross at the lift time exactly. That's your on-the-record artifact: outlets that didn't take the embargo can pick it up the moment it crosses, and it becomes the canonical, permanent version of the announcement. If you're coordinating both, build the release before you start pitching. Our templates give you the structure, and distribution scheduling is what pins the timing down.
One caution: never send the finished release to an embargoed reporter as your only material. A release is a record. They want the thing behind it: the data, the interviews, the customer who'll talk. The release is the floor, not the offer.
Planning a launch with a real timeline? [See our pricing](/pricing), with scheduling included and no sales call.