A reporter posts a query: "Looking for small business owners who've dropped a major software vendor in the last year. Need by Thursday 3pm ET." Forty people respond. Two get quoted. The difference between those two and the other thirty-eight is almost never expertise. It's speed, format, and whether the answer was usable without editing.
Here's how to be one of the two.
Speed is the single biggest lever
Most writers work the responses in order and stop when they have enough. On a typical query, the first three to five usable answers fill the slots. Responses arriving on day two are often read by nobody.
Practical rules:
- Respond within the first hour when you can. Inside 24 hours at the absolute outside, regardless of what the stated deadline says.
- Stated deadlines are when the piece is due, not when responses stop being read. A Thursday deadline usually means the reporter is writing Wednesday night with whatever they already have.
- Set up filters so queries hit your phone. A rule that flags source-platform digests and pushes a notification is the entire infrastructure required.
- If you're late and it's a strong fit, say so and offer anyway. "Probably too late for this one, but if you need a second source: [answer]" costs you one sentence and occasionally works.
Speed does not mean sloppy. It means having a decision process fast enough that a good answer takes you eight minutes, not eighty.
The format that gets used
Writers copy and paste. Make that possible.
- Subject or first line: the query name, then your one-line credential. "Re: small business software churn. I run ops for a 6-location dental group, dropped Dentrix in March."
- Two to four short paragraphs, first person, under 150 words total. Quotable sentences, not a summary of your views. If the reporter has to rewrite it to use it, they'll use someone else's.
- Answer the actual question asked. Every part of it. If they asked for three things, give three things, labeled.
- One specific number, date, or example. "We were paying $2,400 a month and using four of the eleven modules" is a quote. "It wasn't providing value" is filler.
- Attribution block at the bottom: full name, exact title, company name, city, website URL. Write it the way you want it printed, because that's how it'll be printed.
- Plain text. No attachments, no decks, no logos, no tracked links. If they want a headshot, they'll ask.
That's it. No greeting paragraph about how much you admire their work, no company boilerplate, and no "happy to jump on a call." Offer the call as a final line if you want, but give them the usable answer first. A reporter on deadline will not schedule a call to get a sentence they could have had in your email.
Framing your credential without inflating it
The credential is what makes your sentence worth printing, and it's the part most people get wrong in both directions, either underselling ("I'm just a small business owner") or inflating ("award-winning thought leader and serial entrepreneur").
What works is specific, verifiable, and proportionate:
- Scale: "18 employees", "$4M in annual revenue", "we ship about 900 orders a week"
- Tenure: "nine years in commercial insurance"
- Direct experience with the exact thing asked about: "we migrated off it in March"
- Position: your real title at a company with a real website
What doesn't work: "expert", "guru", "thought leader", "industry veteran", vague awards, and certifications nobody outside your field has heard of. Also avoid borrowed authority, because quoting stats you read somewhere makes you a summarizer, and reporters have Google too.
One more thing that matters more than founders expect: be checkable. A reporter at any real outlet will look you up before quoting you. A website with a team page, a LinkedIn profile that matches what you claimed, and a press page with your bio and headshot takes the friction out of that check. If nothing about you is verifiable in 90 seconds, you don't get quoted no matter how good the answer was.
What a quotable answer looks like
Weak:
Software churn is a growing problem for SMBs. Many businesses are re-evaluating their tech stacks due to economic pressure and looking for more value from their vendors. Our company has helped many clients navigate this.
Strong:
We dropped our practice management software in March after nine years. We were paying $2,400 a month and actively using four of its eleven modules. We'd been buying the other seven out of inertia. The migration took eleven weeks and cost us about $18,000 in staff time, which is why most practices our size don't do it even when they know they should. The savings paid that back in nine months. Dr. Amara Osei, owner, Northside Dental Group (Columbus, OH), northsidedental.example
The second one gets used because it has a number, an admission against interest, and a sentence that generalizes beyond the speaker. That middle quality (saying something true that isn't flattering to you) is the most underrated trait in a source. It's the reason reporters come back to some people directly for years.
When to pass
Not responding is a real strategy. It protects the thing that makes this channel work over time, which is being someone a writer trusts. Pass when:
- You don't genuinely have the experience asked for. Adjacent is not the same. The person who answers every query becomes the person whose emails get filtered.
- The query is a link-building exercise dressed as journalism. Signs: no outlet named, "guest post opportunity", a fee mentioned in either direction, or a site whose entire archive is 2,000-word roundups. Some of these are fine as SEO plays, so price the effort accordingly and don't call it press.
- Answering honestly would hurt you. Litigation, an employee matter, a customer's confidential data, anything under NDA. "No comment" costs nothing. An unguarded quote in print costs plenty.
- The topic is a landmine and you have no standing. Commenting on a competitor's scandal, a tragedy, or a political fight because it's trending is how a quote becomes a screenshot.
Also pass when you'd be the fourth-best source on a topic where you have a real conflict of interest. Reporters find out.
The compounding part
Responses that get used lead to a reporter saving your name. Two or three of those and you stop needing the query platforms for that beat, because you're in someone's contacts as "the person who answers fast and says useful things." That's the actual asset. Source platforms are just the introduction mechanism. The broader playbook for getting coverage without an agency is mostly about what happens after the introduction.
Have news rather than commentary? Every package is listed, with no sales call. [See RepuPR's pricing](/pricing).